Graduate Colloquium, Spring 2008
Wednesdays, Grigg Hall, Room 132, 12:30-1:30, Bring Your Lunch
See
Below for Presentation Format and Content Advice
|
T
1/15 |
Course Overview. Meet at10:30, Room 132, Grigg. Aside from this first class, there will be
no classes on Tuesdays. Those enrolled
in OPTI6110/8110 are required to attend 5 Wednesday Colloquia, and ask 3
questions over the duration of the semester. |
|
Wed
1/23 |
Photonics West - No Colloquium |
|
Wed
1/30 |
1. Seungmoo Yang (Astratov)
2. Xiaoxia Wu (Xu) |
|
Wed
2/6 |
1. John Schenk (Fiddy)
2. April Cook (M. Davies) |
Wed
2/13 |
1. Kristin Walker (Tyson)
2. Mona Mayeh (Farahi) |
|
Wed
2/20 |
1. Young-Sik Ghim (A. Davies)
2. Shahab Chitchian
(Fried) |
Wed
2/27 |
OFC - No Graduate Colloquium |
|
Wed
3/5 |
Spring Break - No Graduate Colloquium |
|
Wed 3/12 |
1. Ozan Yilmaz (Johnson)
2. Choon How Gan (Gbur) |
|
Wed F
3/19 |
1. Virginia Gomez (A. Davies)
2. Serhat Tozburun |
|
Wed
3/26 |
1. Kaia Buhl
(Johnson)
2. Rahul Sahariah
(Stokes) |
|
Wed
3/30 |
1. Mehrdad Abolbashari
2. Yi-Chen Chuang (Suleski) |
|
Wed 4/2 |
1. Wesley Parker (Moyer)
2. Ying Li |
|
Wed
4/9 |
1. Wes Parker (P. Moyer)
2. Ying Li (E. Stokes)
|
|
Wed
4/16 |
1. Zach Roth (Johnson)
2. Daryl Purcell (A. Davies)
|
Wed
4/23 |
1. Javaid Ikram (A. Davies)
2. April Cooke (M. Davies) |
Wed
4/30
|
1. Yalong Gu (Gbur)
2. Ting Shi
|
Talk Length: You have a 30 minute time slot, 20 minutes of
prepared material with ~10 minutes for questions.
Title Advice:
Be
sure your title does two things:
1)
defines the field of study and
2)
indicates what sets this work apart from the other ongoing work in the field.
Good
Example:
"Effects of Humidity on the Growth of
Avalanches"
Field of Study:
“Growth of Avalanches”
What sets the work apart: “Effects of Humidity”
Bad
Examples:
"Studies on the Electrodeposition
of Lead on Copper" – The field of study is defined, but what sets this
work apart? What ‘Studies’?
"Reducing the Hazards of Operations" –
What is the field of study?
Reduced? How?
Introduction Advice:
- Devote at least 5 minutes of
prepared material for the introduction.
- Start from the ‘Big
Picture’ and work your way to the specifics of your project.
- In what field of
study does your research fall?
- Why is this an interesting
and important field of study to advance?
- How does your work
advance this field?
- Who will be
interested? What technologies might
this impact?
- Ease the audience
gradually into the technical details of your research. Your goal is to make your talk
interesting and educational. The
audience will be very diverse – electrical engineering, mechanical
engineering, physics, chemistry, etc..
Most are not familiar with your field of study. Avoid jargon.
- What are the
‘fundamental optics/science’ components at the heart of your work? Think of what is covered in the core
courses - this is what you can assume the audience knows.
- Tie the fundamental
physics/optics behind your research into the introduction of your
subject.
- Don’t worry about
boring the faculty and staff.
Never underestimate the joy one receives in being told something
they already know…
Talk Layout Advice:
- Try including a
picture to orient and bullets of the few (2-4) key points to remember on
your introductory slide. Key points
are the main conclusions of your talk – the big picture points you hope
are remembered. Studies show that
an audience remembers at most 50% of what is presented –the best-case
scenario. Make sure they remember
the 50% you want remembered.
Repetition is one way to do this – say your key points at the
beginning, describe them in the middle, and repeat them at the end.
- Use a headline
statement at the top of every slide (except the title and conclusion
slides). The headline statement is
the conclusion or main point of the slide.
No more than 2 lines – a succinct complete sentence. It is possible to come up with this
statement for every slide – else why are you showing the slide?
- The body of the slide
provides the evidence that supports the headline statement.
- Use as many pictures
and/or sketches as you can. This
quickly orients the audience.
Having them read words and generate their own mental picture isn’t
efficient. Save them the trouble -
provide the mental picture.
- People can remember
no more than 3-4 items in a list – any more than this and the whole list
may be forgotten…
- Don’t fall into the
trap of putting together a talk that is a hybrid of a presentation and a
technical publication. Think
carefully about the level of detail that is appropriate and necessary. It
is very easy, common, and tempting to put far more detail into a talk than
can be absorbed or is necessary.
Save the details for your peer-reviewed publication …